ahh
LOGIN / SIGN UP
Te Arapiki Ako
"Towards better teaching & learning"
 

Bibliography


Comment on this item  
 
Add to your favourites
Remove from your favourites
Add a note on this item
Recommend to a friend
Comment on this item
Send to printer
Request a reminder of this item
Cancel a reminder of this item
Share |
Last updated 26 October 2012 15:30 by NZTecAdmin

Absolum, M., Flockton, L., Hattie, J., Hipkins, R., and Reid, I. (2009). Directions for Assessment in New Zealand: Developing students’ assessment capabilities. Accessed 21 June 2010 from Te Kete Ipurangi www.tki.org.nz/r/assessment/research/mainpage.directions/

Aikenhead, G. (1997). A framework for reflecting on assessment and evaluation. Paper presented at the Globalization of Science Education: International Conference on Science Education, Seoul, Korea, 26–30 May.

Anderson, R. C. (2004). Role of reader’s schema in comprehension, learning and memory. In R. B. Ruddell and N. J. Unrau (eds), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, 5th ed. (pp. 594–606). Newark, Del: International Reading Association.

Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math Anxiety: Personal, Educational, and Cognitive Consequences. Current directions in psychological science: a journal of the American Psychological Society, 181–185.

Ashcraft, M. H., & Kirk, E. P. (2001). The Relationships Among Working Memory, Math Anxiety, and Performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 130 (2), 224–237.

Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., William, D., & Johnson, D. (1997). Effective Teachers of Numeracy. London: King’s College London.

Assessment Reform Group. (2002). The ARG Assessment Reform Group. Accessed 21 June 2010 from http://www.assessment-reform-group.org.uk/

Ball, D. L. (1990). Reflections and Deflections of Policy: The Case of Carol Turner. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12 (3), 247–259.

Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the Book: What Is – or Might Be – the Role of Curriculum Materials in Teacher Learning and Instructional Reform. Educational Researcher, 25 (9), 6–14.

Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995, November/December). From Teaching to Learning. Change, 12–25.

Barton, D., Appleby, Y., Hodge, R., Tusting, K. and Ivanic, R. (April 2006). Research Report: Relating adults’ lives and learning: participation and engagement in different settings. National Research and Development Centre. Accessed 21 June 2010 from http://www.nrdc.org.uk/publications.

Bates, S. (2005). Integrating Literacies: The CAVSS approach. Reflect, 26–27.

Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The Teacher-curriculum Encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Benseman, J., & Sutton, A. (2007). A synthesis of foundation learning evaluation and research in New Zealand since 2003. A report prepared for the Department of Labour Auckland: Critical Insight.

Bingman, B., & Stein, S. (2001). Results That Matter, An Approach to Program Quality Using Equipped for the Future. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy. Accessed 21 June 2010 from http://eff.cls.utk.edu/PDF/results-that-matter.pdf

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box. Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: nferNelson.

Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1995). Expanding a Teacher’s Knowledge Base: A Cognitive Psychological Perspective on Professional Development. In T. Guskey, & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional Development in Education, New Paradigms and Practices (pp. 35–66).New York, NY: Teachers’ College Press.

Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington DC.: National Academy Press.

Brown, M., & Edelson, D. (2003). Teaching As Design: Can we better understand the ways in which teachers use materials so we can better design materials to support their changes in practice? Evanston, IL: The Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools.

Brown, S., Race, P., and Smith, B. (1996) An Assessment Manifesto. Downloaded 21 June 2010 from www.londonmet.ac.uk/deliberations/assessment/manifesto.cfm]

Bruner, J. (1985). Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 21–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Business New Zealand; New Zealand Council of Trade Unions; Industry Training Federation; New Zealand Government (2008). New Zealand Skills Strategy Action Plan 2008. Accessed 22 September 2008, from NZ Skills Strategy: http://www.skillsstrategy.govt.nz/.

Business NZ, New Zealand Council of Trade Unions, Industry Training Federation, & Workbase. (2007). The key steps forward for workforce literacy. Wellington.

Butler, D. L., Lauscher, H. N., Sandra, J. S., & Beckingham, B. (2004). Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 435–455.

Carpentieri, J. (November 2008). Research Briefing: Formative Assessment. National Research and Development Centre. Accessed 21 June 2010 from http://www.nrdc.org.uk/publications

Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (2002). Is Everyday Mathematics Truly Relevant to Mathematics Education? (J. Moshkovich & M. Brenner, Eds.) Monographs of the Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11, 131–153.

Casey, H., Cara, O., Eldred, J., Grief, S., Hodge, R., Ivaniĉ, R., et al. (2006). “You Wouldn’t Expect a Maths Teacher to Teach Plastering ...” Embedding literacy, language and numeracy in post-16 vocational programmes – the impact on learning and achievement. London: NRDC.

Cobb, P. (2007). Putting Philosophy to Work: Coping With Multiple Theoretical Perspectives. In F. K. Lester, Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 3–38). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Cobb, P. (1994). Where Is the Mind? Constructivist and Sociocultural Perspectives on Mathematical Development. Educational Researcher, 23 (7), 13–20.

Coben, D. (2003). Adult Numeracy: Review of research and related literature. London: NRDC.

Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Instruction, Capacity and Improvement. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium.

Comings, J., Parrella, A., & Soricone, L. (2000). Helping Adults Persist: Four Supports. Focus on Basics, 4 (A), 1–6.

Cranmer, S., Kersh, N., Evans, K., Jupp, T., Casey, H., & Sagan, O. (2004). Putting Good Practice into Practice: Literacy, numeracy and key skills within apprenticeships. London: NRDC.

Cumming, J., & Gal, I. (2000). Assessment in Adult Numeracy Education: Issues and principles for good practice. In I. Gal (Ed.), Adult Numeracy Development: Theory, research, practice (pp. 305–333). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Derrick, J. and Ecclestone, K. (2008). “English-language Literature Review” in Teaching, Learning and Assessment for Adults: Improving Foundation Skills. OECD Publishing. Accessed 21 June 2010 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/172251338713

DeSeCo (2003) The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies. Downloaded 21 June 2010 from http://www.deseco.admin.ch/bfs/deseco/en/index/02.html

DfES Skills for Life Strategy Unit (undated). Raising Standards Guides: Further Education Colleges. Retrieved 15 August 2008, from Department for Children, Schools and Families: http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/readwriteplus/raisingstandards/fec2/leadership/howeffective/howtosuccess/.

DuFour, R. (2004, May). What is a “Professional Learning Community”? Educational Leadership, 6–11.

Ecclestone, K. (2004), “Learning in a Comfort Zone: Cultural and Social Capital in Outcome-based Assessment Regimes” in Assessment in Education, Vol. 11, 1, pp. 30-47.

Evans, J. (2000). Adults’ Mathematical Thinking and Emotions: A study of numerate practices. New York: Routledge Falmer.

Equipped for the Future (n.d.) http://eff.cls.utk.edu/fundamentals/eff_standards.htm#knowledge

Fosnot, C. (1996). Constructivism: A Psychological Theory of Learning. In C. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice (pp. 8–33). New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.

Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Ansell, E., & Behrend, J. (1998). Understanding Teachers’ Self-Sustaining Generative Change in the Context of Professional Development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14 (1), 67–80.

Gray, A. (2006). Literature review to inform a work programme on lifting literacy, numeracy and language skills. Commissioned by the Department of Labour. Wellington: Gray Matter Research Ltd.

Gillespie, M. K. (2002a). EFF Research Principle: A Contextualized Approach to Curriculum and Instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

Gillespie, M. K. (2002b). EFF Research Principle: A Purposeful and Transparent Approach to Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

Gillespie, M. K. (2002c). EFF Research Principle: An Approach to Teaching and Learning That Builds Expertise. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

Govers, E. (2008). Starting from Scratch: An exploration into embedding literacy and numeracy in existing programmes. Eastern Institute of Technology. .

Gunnarsson, B. L. (1997). The writing process from a sociolinguistic viewpoint. Written Communication, vol. 14, no. 2, 139–150.

Guskey, T. (2000). Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press Inc.

Hartley, R., & Horne, J. (2005). Social and economic benefits of improved adult literacy: Towards a better understanding. Support document. Adelaide: NCVER.

Hattie, J. (2003). “Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence?” Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational research Annual Conference on Building Teacher Quality, October. Accessed 21 June 2010 from http://www.visionschools.co.nz/assets/documents/john_hattie.PDF

Ivaniĉ, R., Appleby, Y., Hodge, R., Tusting, K., and Barton, D. (2006). Linking Learning and Everyday Life: A Social Perspective on Adult Literacy, Language and Numeracy Classes. National Research Development Council Report. London: NRDC. Accessed 21 June 2010 from http://www.nrdc.org.uk/publications

Johnston, B. (1995). “Critical Numeracy?”. Fine Print, vol. 16, no. 4 (Summer), pp.32-35.

Johnston, G. (2004). Adult literacy and economic growth (No. Working Paper 04/24). Wellington: Treasury.

Kruidenier, J. (2002). Research-based Principles for Adult Basic Education Reading Instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

Lander, J. (2005). Assessing literacy requirements and workers' literacy skills. A literature review of entry-level roles. Auckland: Workbase: the New Zealand Centre for Workforce Literacy Development.

Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Learning and Skills Council (2007). Evaluation of Skills for Life Quality Initiative 2005–06.

Levenson, A. (2004). Why do companies provide workplace education programs? . In J. Comings, B. Garner & C. Smith (Eds.), (Vol. 4, pp. 71-108). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Levesque, K., Bradby, D., & Rossi, K. (1996). Using Data for Program Improvement: How Do We Encourage Schools To Do It? Centrefocus, 12, 1–6.

Linn, R., & Miller, M. (2005). Measurement and assessment in teaching (9th edition). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson.

Literacy and Basic Skills Program of the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board (2004). An Exploration of Collaborative Materials Development in Adult Numeracy Teaching. Retrieved 19 August 2008, from National Adult Literacy Database: http://www.nald.ca/fulltext/cmdreport/cover.htm.

Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

MacCormick, J. (2008). Working smarter: driving productivity growth through skills. NZ Treasury Productivity Paper 08/06. Wellington: New Zealand Treasury Productivity Paper.

McShane, S. (2005) Applying Research in Reading Instruction for Adults. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

Ministry of Education (undated). Tertiary Education Strategy 2007–12 incorporating the Statement of Tertiary Education Priorities 2008–10. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Development (2006). Skills for Life Quality Initiative, Embedded Teaching and Learning. London: NRDC.

New Zealand Council for Educational Research (2006). Assessment for Foundation Learning: The Importance of Purposeful Assessment in Adult Literacy, Numeracy and Language Courses. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In S. G (Ed.), Distributed Cognitions, Psychological and Educational Considerations (pp. 47–87). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Piaget, J. (1978). The Development of Thought, Equilibration of Cognitive Structures. (A. Rosin, Trans.) Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Reid, S. (2008). Learning it on the job: foundation skills in the workplace. In J. Benseman & A. Sutton (Eds.), Facing the challenge. Foundation learning for adults in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 960109). Palmerston North: Dunmore Publishing Ltd.

Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75 (2), 211–246.

Roberts, C., Baynham, M., Shrubshall, P., Brittan, J., Cooper, B., Gidley, N., et al. (2005). Embedded Teaching and Learning of Adult Literacy, Numeracy and ESOL: Seven case studies. London: NRDC.

Ryan, R. (2007). Why workplaces matter: the role of workplace practices in economic transformation Wellington: Department of Labour.

Sagan, O., Waite, E., Cowan, S., Casey, H., & Evans, K. (2005). Putting Good Practice into Practice: Literacy, numeracy and key skills in apprenticeships. London: NRDC.

Satherley, P. and Lawes, E. (2007). The Adult Literacy and Life Skills (ALL) Survey: An Introduction. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

Saxe, G. (1988). Candy Selling and Math Learning. Educational Researcher, 14–21.

Schmitt, M. J. (2000). Developing Adults’ Numerate Thinking: Getting Out From Under the Workbooks. Focus on Basics, 4 (B).

Scribner, S. (1988). Head and Hand: An Action Approach to Thinking. Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association. Arlington, VA.

Sherin, M., & Drake, C. (2004). Janine Remillard. Retrieved 19 August 2008, from The University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education: http://www.gse.upenn.edu/~janiner/pdf/Sherin.drake.curricmodels.pdf.

Smylie, M. A. (1995). Teacher Learning in the Workplace: Implications for School Reform. In T. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional Development in Education, New Paradigms and Practices (pp. 92–113). New York: Teachers College Press.

Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Stein, S. (2000). Equipped for the future content standards: What adults need to know and be able to do in the 21st century. Washington DC.: National Institute for Literacy.

Stikes, R. (n.d.) EFF research principle: an approach to assessment based on cognitive science. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

Stities, R. (2002). EFF Research Principle: An Approach to Assessment Based on Cognitive Science. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

Swain, J., Baker, E., Holder, D., Newmarch, B., & Coben, D. (2005). ‘Beyond the daily application’: Making numeracy teaching meaningful to adult learners. London: NRDC.

Tertiary Education Commission (2008a). Literacy, Language and Numeracy Action Plan 2008–2012. Wellington: Tertiary Education Commission.

Tertiary Education Commission (2008b). Learning Progressions for Adult Literacy and Numeracy: Background Information. Wellington: Tertiary Education Commission.

Tertiary Education Commission (2008c).Learning Progressions for Adult Numeracy. Wellington: Tertiary Education Commission.

Timperley, H. (2008). Teacher Professional Learning and Development, Educational Practices Series; 3. Brussels: International Bureau of Education.

Timperley, H. (2009). “Using assessment data for improving teaching practice.” In Professional Educator vol. 8 No. 3 September: Australian College of Educators (ACER).

Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H. and Fung, I. (2007). Teacher Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

Thomas, G. & Ward, J. (2009). Numeracy for adults: Latest findings from teaching and learning research. Wellington: Ministry of Education. Accessed June 21, 2010, from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/ tertiary_education/51931/1.

Torgerson, C., Brooks, G., Porthouse, J., Burton, M., Robinson, A., Wright, K., et al. (2004). Adult Literacy and Numeracy Interventions and Outcomes: A review of controlled trials. London: NRDC.

Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3((2008)), 130-154.

US Department of Education (2003). Using NRS Data for Program Management and Improvement. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.

Vaughan, K. (2008). Workplace learning: a literature review. A report prepared for Competenz. Wellington: NZCER.

von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). A Constructivist Approach to Teaching. In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in Education (pp. 3–15). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and Speech. In L. S. Vygotsky, R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky (N. Minick, Trans., Vol. 1, pp. 37–285). New York: Plenum Press.

Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher Learning and the Acquisition of Professional Knowledge: An Examination of Research on Contemporary Professional Development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209.

Workbase. (2006a). The descriptor bank project. Describing the literacy in unit standards. from http://elearning.workbase.org.nz/course/view.php?id=12&username=guest.

Workbase. (2006b). Element Bank project IDF #510 Final report Auckland: Workbase.

Workbase. (2006c). Part 1: Synthesis of Workbase development and research projects: 2000-2005. Auckland: Workbase: the New Zealand Centre for Workforce Literacy Development - prepared for the TEC.

Workbase. (2006d). Part 3: Summaries of projects conducted by Workbase from 2000-2005. Auckland: Workbase: the New Zealand Centre for Workforce Literacy Development - prepared for the TEC.

Comments

If you have any comments please contact us.

Search this section

Knowing the Demands Knowing the Learner Knowing the What to Do

News feeds

Subscribe to newsletter